Read Full Post

Court orders father to pay more maintenance to his minor son

Observing that the businessman has been switching his versions from time to time, the judges concluded “It also indicates that the respondent (businessman) has done this with the object of avoiding his liability to pay maintenance to the appellant –his minor son. It can also be gathered that the respondent has in fact made false statement on oath before the family court that he is earning a salary and that he is not a businessman, which is very serious”.

Bombay High Court, Latest Notifications, Legal News