HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
P. K. R. Menon, for the Applicant : C. N. Ramachandran Nair, for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.J. :
At the
instance of the Revenue, following question has been referred by the Tribunal, Cochin
Bench for opinion in terms of section 256
(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (in short the Act).
(in short
th "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is
entitled to investment allowance on computers ?"
2. The factual position as set out in the statement of case is as follows. Assessee is a
public limited company mainly engaged in the business of growing tea, rubber, cardamom,
etc. and also executing engineering contract works. If claimed investment allowance on
computers installed in the estate offices.
The AO disallowed the claim for investment allowance on the ground that those machines are
office equipments. On appeal, the CIT(A) allowed the claim by referring to a decision of
the Bombay High Court in CIT vs. I.B.M. World Trade Corpn. (1981) 130 ITR 739 (Bom) : TC
28R.211. Revenue contested the correctness of such decision before the Tribunal. It was
observed by the Tribunal that the assessee is entitled to get investment allowance on
computers in the light of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in CIT vs. Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 17 (Cal) : TC 28R.210. At the instance of the Revenue as
stated above, the question has been referred to.
3. With
reference to section 32A of the Act,
learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that certain conditions have to be fulfilled
before deduction can be granted, and the conditions were not fulfilled to be entitled to
deduction. According to learned counsel for the assessee, the CIT(A) and the Tribunal
found that the factual position clearly indicated about entitlement of assessee to get the
benefit.
4. Whether
a particular machine is liable for deduction or not would depend upon the prescriptions in
the relevant provision and the factual position of the case. Sec. 32A (2)(b)(iii) is relevant to the
purpose of the case. Sec. 32A (1) and
(2) reads as follows:
(in short
th "32A (1) In respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or plant specified in
sub-section (2) which is owned by the assessee and is wholly used for the purposes of the
business carried on by him, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions
of this section, be allowed a deduction; in respect of the previous year in which the ship
or aircraft was acquired or the machinery or plant was installed or if the ship, aircraft,
machinery or plant is first put to use in the immediately succeeding previous year, then,
in respect of that previous year, of a sum by way of investment allowance equal to
twenty-five per cent of the actual cost of the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant to the
assessee :
Provided that in respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or plant specified in
sub-section (8B), this sub-section shall have effect as if for the words "twenty-five
per cent", the words "twenty per cent" had been substituted :
Provided further that no deduction shall be allowed under this section in respect of
-
(a) any machinery or plant installed in any office premises or any residential
accommodation, including any accommodation in the nature of a guest house;
(b) any office appliances or road transport vehicles;
(in short
the (c) any ship, machinery or plant in respect of which the deduction by way of
development rebate is allowable under section
33 and
(in short
th (d) any machinery or plant, the whole of the actual cost of which is allowed as a
deduction (whether by way of depreciation or otherwise) in computing the income chargeable
under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" of any one previous
year.
(2) The ship or aircraft or machinery or plant referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the
following, namely
(a) a new ship or new aircraft acquired after the 31st March, 1976 by an assessee engaged
in the business of operation of ships or aircraft;
(b) any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st March, 1976, -
(i) for the purposes of business of generation or distribution of electricity or any other
form of power; or
(ii) in a small-scale industrial undertaking for the purposes of business of manufacture
or production of any article or thing; or
(iii) in any other industrial undertaking for the purposes of business of construction,
manufacture or production of any article or thing not being an article or thing, specified
in the list in the Eleventh Schedule :
Provided that nothing contained in cls. (a) and (b) shall apply in relation to, -
(i) a new ship or new aircraft acquired, or
(ii) any new machinery or plant installed, after the 31st March, 1987 but before the 1st
day of April, 1988 unless such ships or aircraft is acquired or such machinery or plant in
installed in the circumstances specified in cl. (a) of sub-section (8B) and the assessee
furnishes evidence to the satisfaction of the AO an specified in that clause.
(c) any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st March, 1983 but before the 1st day
of April, 1987 for the purposes of business of repairs to ocean-going vessels or other
powered craft if the business is carried on by an Indian company and the business so
carried on is for the time being approved for the purposes of this clause by the Central
Government."
Undisputedly, in order to be eligible the stipulations as laid in the provisions have to
be satisfied. The assessee has to prove that the conditions were fulfilled with reference
to the factual background. On a reading of the orders passed by the CIT(A) and the
Tribunal, we do not find any discussion with regard to the factual aspect and only with
reference to the decisions rendered by the High Courts, the matter was disposed of.
Whether the decisions were applicable to the facts of the case has not been analysed. In
the circumstances, we remit the matter back to the Tribunal for examining the factual
aspect and record its conclusion about the entitlement or otherwise of the assessee.
The IT reference is disposed of as above. |