Jammu And Kashmir Suits Valuation Act, 1977
- 2. Repealed.
- 3. Power for High Court to make rules determining value of land to jurisdictional purpose
- 4. Valuation of relief in certain suits relating to land not to exceed the value of the land.
- 5. Enforcement of rules
- 6. Repealed.
- 7. Repealed.
- 8. Court-fee wale and jurisdictional value to the same in certain suits.
- 9. Determination of value of certain suits by High Court.
- 10. Repealed.
- 11. Procedure where objection is token on appeal or revision that a suit or appeal was not properly valued for jurisdictional purposes
- 12. Repealed.
[Act No. 38 of 1977]
An Act to prescribe the3 mode of valuing certain suits for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts with respect there to. WHERE AS it is expedient to prescribe- the mode of valuing certain suits for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts- with respect thereto;
It is here- by enacted as follows:-
3. Power for High Court to make rules determining value of land to jurisdictional purpose
(1) The High Court may, with the previous sanction of the Government, make rules for determining the value of land for purposes of jurisdiction in the suits mentioned the Court-fees Act, section 7-, Paragraphs V and VI, and paragraph X, clause (d).
(2) The rules may determine the value of any class of land, or of any interest in land, in the whole or any part of a local, area, and may prescribe different values for different places within the same local area.
4. Valuation of relief in certain suits relating to land not to exceed the value of the land.
Where a suit mentioned in the Court-fees Act, section 7-; paragraph IV, or Schedule II, Article a 17, relates- to land or an interest in land of which the value has been determined by rules under the last foregoing section, the amount at which for purposes of .jurisdiction the relief sought in the suit is valued shall mot exceed the value of the land or interest as determined by those rules.
5. Enforcement of rules
(2) A rule undersection 3-shall not take effect till the expiration of one month after the rule has been published in the Jammu and Kashmir Government Gazette.
8. Court-fee wale and jurisdictional value to the same in certain suits.
Where in suits other than those referred to in the .Court-fees’ Act, section 7-, paragraphs V, VI and IX, and paragraph X clause (d), count-fees are payable ad valorem under the Court-fees Act, the value as determinable for the computation of court-fees and the value for purposes of jurisdiction shall be the same.
9. Determination of value of certain suits by High Court.
When the subject- matter of suits of any class, other than suits mentioned in the Court-fees Act, section 7-, paragraphs V and VI and paragraph X, clause (d), is such that in the opinion of the High Court it does not admit of being satisfactorily valued, the High Court may with the previous -sanction of the Government direct that suits of that class shall, for the purposes of the Court-fees Act, and of this Act and any other enactment for the time being in .force, be treated as if their subject-matter were of such value as the High Court thinks fit to specify in this behalf.
11. Procedure where objection is token on appeal or revision that a suit or appeal was not properly valued for jurisdictional purposes
(1) Notwithstanding any- thing insections 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure-, an objection that by reason of the over-valuation or under-valuation of a suit or appeal a Court of first instance or lower appellate Court which had not jurisdiction with respect to the suit or appeal exercised jurisdiction with respect thereto shall not be entertained by an appellate Court unless-
(a) the objection was taken in -the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower appellate Court in the memorandum of appeal to that Court, or
(b) the appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued, and that the over-valuation or under-valuation thereof has prejudicially affected “the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits.
(2) If the objection was taken in the manner mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1), but the appellate Court is not satisfied as ‘to both the matters mentioned in Clause (b) of that sub-section and has before it the materials necessary for the determination of the other grounds of appeal to itself, it shall dispose of the appeal as if there had been no defect of jurisdiction in the Court of first instance or lower appellate Court.
(3) If the objection was taken in that manner and the appellate Court is satisfied as to both those matters and has not those materials before it, it shall proceed to deal with the appeal under the rules applicable to the Court with respect to the hearing of appeals: but .if it remands the suit or appeal, or frames and refers issues for trial, or requires additional evidence to be taken, it shall direct its order to a Court competent to entertain the suit or appeal.
(4) The provisions of this section with respect to an appellate Court shall, so far as they can be made applicable, apply -to a Court exercising provisional jurisdiction undersection 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure-or other enactment for the time being in force.